🔗 Share this article

Thhese days exhibit a quite unique phenomenon: the inaugural US parade of the babysitters. They vary in their skills and characteristics, but they all possess the common mission – to prevent an Israeli violation, or even devastation, of Gaza’s unstable truce. Since the hostilities finished, there have been rare occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s representatives on the scene. Just in the last few days saw the likes of a senior advisor, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all coming to carry out their assignments.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In just a few short period it executed a wave of operations in Gaza after the loss of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) personnel – resulting, as reported, in many of Palestinian fatalities. Several ministers demanded a resumption of the war, and the Knesset enacted a early resolution to incorporate the occupied territories. The American stance was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the American government seems more focused on maintaining the existing, unstable period of the ceasefire than on progressing to the subsequent: the reconstruction of Gaza. Concerning that, it looks the US may have ambitions but little concrete proposals.

At present, it remains unknown at what point the suggested multinational oversight committee will effectively take power, and the similar goes for the appointed security force – or even the makeup of its soldiers. On Tuesday, a US official stated the United States would not impose the composition of the foreign contingent on Israel. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to reject one alternative after another – as it acted with the Turkish proposal recently – what happens then? There is also the contrary point: who will determine whether the forces preferred by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?

The issue of the duration it will take to demilitarize Hamas is similarly unclear. “Our hope in the government is that the international security force is going to now take charge in disarming the organization,” stated the official lately. “That’s going to take a while.” Trump only reinforced the ambiguity, declaring in an conversation recently that there is no “rigid” schedule for the group to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unnamed participants of this yet-to-be-formed global contingent could arrive in Gaza while Hamas fighters continue to wield influence. Are they confronting a leadership or a insurgent group? Among the many of the questions surfacing. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for average Palestinians as things stand, with Hamas persisting to focus on its own adversaries and dissidents.

Latest developments have yet again underscored the gaps of Israeli reporting on the two sides of the Gazan border. Every publication strives to examine all conceivable perspective of Hamas’s violations of the peace. And, in general, the situation that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has dominated the coverage.

On the other hand, attention of non-combatant fatalities in the region caused by Israeli operations has garnered scant notice – if at all. Take the Israeli response strikes following Sunday’s southern Gaza incident, in which a pair of soldiers were killed. While local sources reported 44 deaths, Israeli news analysts complained about the “moderate answer,” which targeted just installations.

That is not new. Over the previous weekend, Gaza’s media office alleged Israeli forces of breaking the ceasefire with Hamas multiple occasions since the agreement was implemented, causing the death of 38 individuals and wounding another 143. The assertion was insignificant to most Israeli media outlets – it was just absent. That included information that 11 individuals of a local family were fatally shot by Israeli forces a few days ago.

Gaza’s rescue organization said the group had been trying to return to their residence in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of Gaza City when the bus they were in was fired upon for reportedly crossing the “demarcation line” that demarcates areas under Israeli military control. That boundary is not visible to the ordinary view and appears solely on maps and in government documents – sometimes not obtainable to everyday individuals in the territory.

Yet this event hardly received a reference in Israeli journalism. A major outlet referred to it briefly on its online platform, citing an IDF representative who said that after a suspect car was detected, troops fired alerting fire towards it, “but the car kept to approach the forces in a manner that caused an imminent threat to them. The soldiers shot to neutralize the danger, in line with the truce.” No casualties were claimed.

With this perspective, it is no surprise many Israeli citizens think Hamas exclusively is to blame for breaking the truce. This view risks prompting demands for a more aggressive approach in the region.

At some point – perhaps sooner rather than later – it will not be sufficient for American representatives to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, advising Israel what to avoid. They will {have to|need